| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 41 | |
| 9. |  | PRINCE, S.; BOMFIM, M. A. D.; ANGERER, J.; TEDESCHI, L. O. Efeito da temperatura da amostra na análise de fezes por infravermelhor próximo (NIR) com tecnologia de transmissão por arranjo de diodo. In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 49., 2012, Brasília, DF. A produção animal no mundo em transformação: anais. Brasília, DF: SBZ, 2012. 3 f. 1 CD-ROM.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. |
|    |
| 14. | | TEDESCHI, L. O.; FOX, D. G.; SAINZ, R. D.; BARIONI, L. G.; BOIN, C. Using mathematical models in ruminant nutrition. In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 41., 2004, Campo Grande, MS. A produção animal e a segurança alimentar: anais dos simpósios. Campo Grande, MS: Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia: Embrapa Gado de Corte, 2004. p. 228-238.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. |
| |
| 16. | | MARQUES, J. G. O.; SILVA, R. de O.; BARIONI, L. G.; HALL, J. A. J.; TEDESCHI, L. O.; MORAN, D. An improved algorithm for solving profit-maximizing cattle diet problems. Animal, v. 14, S2, p. S257-S266, Aug. 2020. Issue S2: Edição do 9th Workshop on Modelling Nutrient Digestion and Utilization in Farm Animals (MODNUT), 2019, Ubatuba.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
|  |
| 17. | | TEDESCHI, L. O.; FOX, D. G.; SAINZ, R. D.; BARIONI, L. G.; MEDEIROS, S. R. de; BOIN, C. Mathematical models in ruminant nutrition. Scientia Agrícola, Piracicaba, v. 62, n. 1, p. 76-91 2005.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Cerrados. |
| |
| 18. | | OLIVEIRA, D. E. de; MEDEIROS, S. R. de; TEDESCHI, L. O.; AROEIRA, L. J. M.; SILVA, S. C. da. Estimating forage intake of lactating dual-purpose cows using chromium oxide and n-alkanes as external markers. Scientia Agricola, Piracicaba, v. 64, n. 2, p. 103-110, 2007.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
| |
| 19. | | GALVANI, D. B.; PIRES, A. V.; SUSIN, I.; GOUVÊA, V. N.; BERNDT, A.; ABDALLA, A. L.; TEDESCHI, L. O. Net protein requirements and metabolizable protein use for growing ram lambs fed diets differing in concentrate level and roughage source. Small Ruminant Research, v. 165, n. 79-86, Aug. 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos; Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
| |
| 20. | | BARIONI, L. G.; WOODWARD, S. J. R.; TEDESCHI, L. O.; MACHADO, C. F.; OLTJEN, J. W.; MARTHA JÚNIOR, G. B.; SAINZ, R. D. Current and potential contributions of mathematical modeling to management of grazing systems. In: GRASSLAND ECOPHYSIOLOGY AND GRAZING ECOLOGY, 2., 2004, Curitiba. [Anais...]. Curitiba: UFPR, 2004. 1 CD-ROM.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Cerrados. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 41 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Pantanal. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpap.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pantanal. |
|
Data corrente: |
22/01/2015 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
24/03/2016 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
BAILEY, J. C.; TEDESCHI, L. O.; MENDES, E. D. M.; SAWYER, J. E.; CARSTENS, G. E. |
|
Afiliação: |
J. C. BAILEY, Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station; L.O.TEDESCHI, Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station; EGLEU DIOMEDES MARINHO MENDES, CPAP; J. E. SAWYER, Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station; G. E. CARSTENS, Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station. |
|
Título: |
Technical note: evaluation of bimodal distribution models to determine meal criterion in heifers fed a high-grain diet. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2012 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Animal Science, v. 90, n. 8, p. 2750-2753, aug. 2012. |
|
DOI: |
10.2527/jas2011-4634 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Meals are clusters of feedbunk visit (BV) events that are differentiated from the next meal by a nonfeeding interval that is longer compared with the nonfeeding intervals within a meal. The longest nonfeeding interval considered to be part of a meal is defi ned as the meal criterion. The objective of this study was to determine which combination of 2 probability density functions [(PDF): Gaussian normal (G), Weibull (W), Log-Normal, Gamma, and Gumbel] used in a bimodal distribution model had the best fit of nonfeeding interval data collected in beef heifers. Feeding behavior traits (572,627 total BV events) were measured in 119 heifers fed a high-grain diet (3.08 Mcal ME/kg DM), using a GrowSafe system for 66 d. The frequency and duration of BV events averaged 75 ± 15 events/d and 73.0 ± 22.3 min/d, respectively. The bimodal PDF combinations were fi tted to the log10-transformed interval lengths between BV events for each animal, using R mixdist package (2.13). The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) was used to assess goodness of fi t of the 25 bimodal PDF combinations. The PDF model with the least AIC value was selected as the best fi t for each individual. A x2 analysis of the selected best PDF distribution across individuals revealed that 78.2% of the heifers best fi t were G-W or W-W PDF models. The likelihood probability estimates were calculated from the average AIC deviation of each model from the standard G-G model. The G-W likelihood probability estimate was greater (P = 0.001) than the W-W combination (0.997 vs. 0.727). Our analysis indicated the G-W model had a statistically better fi t and is most likely the best approach to defi ne meal criterion in beef heifers fed high-grain diets. MenosMeals are clusters of feedbunk visit (BV) events that are differentiated from the next meal by a nonfeeding interval that is longer compared with the nonfeeding intervals within a meal. The longest nonfeeding interval considered to be part of a meal is defi ned as the meal criterion. The objective of this study was to determine which combination of 2 probability density functions [(PDF): Gaussian normal (G), Weibull (W), Log-Normal, Gamma, and Gumbel] used in a bimodal distribution model had the best fit of nonfeeding interval data collected in beef heifers. Feeding behavior traits (572,627 total BV events) were measured in 119 heifers fed a high-grain diet (3.08 Mcal ME/kg DM), using a GrowSafe system for 66 d. The frequency and duration of BV events averaged 75 ± 15 events/d and 73.0 ± 22.3 min/d, respectively. The bimodal PDF combinations were fi tted to the log10-transformed interval lengths between BV events for each animal, using R mixdist package (2.13). The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) was used to assess goodness of fi t of the 25 bimodal PDF combinations. The PDF model with the least AIC value was selected as the best fi t for each individual. A x2 analysis of the selected best PDF distribution across individuals revealed that 78.2% of the heifers best fi t were G-W or W-W PDF models. The likelihood probability estimates were calculated from the average AIC deviation of each model from the standard G-G model. The G-W likelihood probability estimate was greater... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Meal criterion. |
|
Thesagro: |
Bovino; Gado; Nutrição animal. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
beef cattle; feeding behavior. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02473naa a2200253 a 4500
001 2006379
005 2016-03-24
008 2012 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.2527/jas2011-4634$2DOI
100 1 $aBAILEY, J. C.
245 $aTechnical note$bevaluation of bimodal distribution models to determine meal criterion in heifers fed a high-grain diet.
260 $c2012
520 $aMeals are clusters of feedbunk visit (BV) events that are differentiated from the next meal by a nonfeeding interval that is longer compared with the nonfeeding intervals within a meal. The longest nonfeeding interval considered to be part of a meal is defi ned as the meal criterion. The objective of this study was to determine which combination of 2 probability density functions [(PDF): Gaussian normal (G), Weibull (W), Log-Normal, Gamma, and Gumbel] used in a bimodal distribution model had the best fit of nonfeeding interval data collected in beef heifers. Feeding behavior traits (572,627 total BV events) were measured in 119 heifers fed a high-grain diet (3.08 Mcal ME/kg DM), using a GrowSafe system for 66 d. The frequency and duration of BV events averaged 75 ± 15 events/d and 73.0 ± 22.3 min/d, respectively. The bimodal PDF combinations were fi tted to the log10-transformed interval lengths between BV events for each animal, using R mixdist package (2.13). The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) was used to assess goodness of fi t of the 25 bimodal PDF combinations. The PDF model with the least AIC value was selected as the best fi t for each individual. A x2 analysis of the selected best PDF distribution across individuals revealed that 78.2% of the heifers best fi t were G-W or W-W PDF models. The likelihood probability estimates were calculated from the average AIC deviation of each model from the standard G-G model. The G-W likelihood probability estimate was greater (P = 0.001) than the W-W combination (0.997 vs. 0.727). Our analysis indicated the G-W model had a statistically better fi t and is most likely the best approach to defi ne meal criterion in beef heifers fed high-grain diets.
650 $abeef cattle
650 $afeeding behavior
650 $aBovino
650 $aGado
650 $aNutrição animal
653 $aMeal criterion
700 1 $aTEDESCHI, L. O.
700 1 $aMENDES, E. D. M.
700 1 $aSAWYER, J. E.
700 1 $aCARSTENS, G. E.
773 $tJournal of Animal Science$gv. 90, n. 8, p. 2750-2753, aug. 2012.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pantanal (CPAP) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
